Showcase Review Submission Form

Showcase Reviewer Submission Form

  • In order to inform our selection process, we ask that you grade each paper or proposal in relation to quality, fit, and innovation. Please also provide an overall recommendation, and an assessment of your expertise in relation to the paper and proposal. Finally, we offer space for open comments. The “comments to the author section” is for helpful feedback that will be shared anonymously with authors. Only the conference committee and staff will have access to the other portions of your review.

    We have had an overwhelming response to the call for proposals, so the selection process will be challenging. While the quality of the papers and proposals is the most important criteria, we are also committed to highlighting a diversity of perspectives and innovative work that speaks to core values of expanding access and progressive and catalytic innovation. We are hugely grateful for your service to our community and your candid assessments.

  • Please use the email address we have on file for you (the email we use to contact you).

  • Review Criteria

  • Provide your overall rating of the quality of the showcase submission. Please consider the quality of the writing of the paper itself. (Hidden from authors).
  • Provide your overall rating of the quality of the proposal. Please consider the quality of the underlying showcase submission. (Hidden from authors).
  • Rate the fit with the CLS mission to “fuel a growing movement of innovators harnessing the power of emerging technology to expand access to participatory, playful, and creative learning.” (Hidden from authors).
  • The CLS is committed to advancing new avenues for inquiry, action, and collaboration in order to foster progressive and catalytic innovation. We value innovation not only in technology and design but also in challenging assumptions and elevating underrepresented perspectives. Rate whether this paper or proposal provides fresh, fun, and innovative thinking and perspectives. (Hidden from authors).
  • Provide your overall recommendation. (Hidden from authors).
  • Provide your expertise in the topic area of this proposal. (Hidden from authors).
  • Comments for internal review, which will be visible to CLS committee members (Hidden from authors):
  • Comments to be shared with the authors. Please provide feedback to the authors on the strengths of the submission and how it could be improved.
  • Flag this submission for committee discussion because (for example) it might deserve special follow up with the submitter, or being considered for another format or an invited session in the main program.